Main Content start here
Main Layout
Report Description

Report Description

Forecast Period

2024-2028

Market Size (2022)

USD 16.09 billion

CAGR (2023-2028)

9.66%

Fastest Growing Segment

Cell Culture Technology

Largest Market

North-America


Market Overview

Global In-vitro Toxicology Testing Market has valued at USD 16.09 Billion in 2022 and is anticipated to project robust growth in the forecast period with a CAGR of 9.66% through 2028. In-vitro Toxicology Testing are the scientific process of evaluating the potential toxic effects of various substances on biological systems outside of a living organism, typically in a laboratory setting. The term "in vitro" is Latin for "in glass," and it signifies experiments conducted in a controlled environment such as test tubes, culture dishes, or other artificial systems rather than in a whole living organism (in vivo). They are utilized to assess the safety of chemicals, drugs, cosmetics, consumer products, and other substances without subjecting animals or humans to potentially harmful effects. These tests provide valuable insights into the potential risks and effects of substances on cellular, molecular, and biochemical levels. In-vitro testing is also often used to screen and prioritize substances for further testing in animal models or clinical trials. In-vitro toxicology testing has several advantages over traditional animal testing, including ethical considerations, reduced cost and time, and potential for high-throughput screening. However, it also has limitations, such as the inability to fully replicate the complexity of whole organisms and potential differences in responses between in-vitro systems and living organisms. In-vitro Toxicology Testing can be categorized based on cell culture assays, Enzyme Assays, Genotoxicity Assays, Cytotoxicity Assays and High-Throughput Screening (HTS) In-vitro Toxicology Testing.

Key Market Drivers

Rising Demand For Safety Assessment Of New Drugs And Chemicals

The rising demand for safety assessment of new drugs and chemicals is a significant driver for the growth of the global in-vitro toxicology testing market. This demand is influenced by several factors that highlight the importance of in-vitro testing methods in ensuring the safety and efficacy of pharmaceuticals, chemicals, and other products. Regulatory agencies, such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA), require comprehensive safety assessments of new drugs and chemicals before they can be approved for human use or commercial release. In-vitro toxicology testing provides a cost-effective and efficient way to generate the necessary data to meet regulatory requirements. Ethical concerns and advancements in scientific understanding have led to a push for reducing or replacing animal testing in safety assessments. In-vitro testing methods offer a more humane alternative by allowing for the assessment of toxic effects without the need for large numbers of animals. In-vitro testing methods are often quicker and less expensive than traditional animal testing. They allow for high-throughput screening, simultaneous testing of multiple compounds, and automation, resulting in faster results and cost savings during the drug discovery and development process. In-vitro toxicology testing enables early-stage safety assessment of compounds in the drug development pipeline. This allows researchers and pharmaceutical companies to identify potential safety concerns and make informed decisions about whether to advance a compound further or modify its structure.

Advances In In-Vitro Toxicology Technologies Propels the Market Growth

Advances in in-vitro toxicology technologies play a crucial role in driving the growth of the global in-vitro toxicology testing market. These technological advancements enhance the accuracy, efficiency, and predictive capabilities of in-vitro testing methods, making them more attractive and valuable for various industries. Innovations in cell culture methods, such as the development of three-dimensional (3D) cell culture models and co-culture systems, better mimic the complexity of tissues and organs in the body. These advancements allow for more accurate assessments of how substances interact with living cells, leading to more reliable toxicological predictions. Organ-on-a-chip platforms replicate the functions of specific organs, allowing researchers to study the effects of substances on organ function and interactions. These microfluidic devices provide a closer representation of in vivo conditions, leading to more physiologically relevant toxicology data. Automation and robotics have revolutionized in-vitro toxicology testing by enabling high-throughput screening of a large number of compounds simultaneously. HTS accelerates the testing process, making it more efficient and cost-effective, which is particularly important for industries with large compound libraries. Cutting-edge imaging technologies, such as live-cell imaging and high-resolution microscopy, allow researchers to monitor cellular responses in real-time. This provides valuable insights into dynamic cellular processes and toxic effects over time.

Increased Awareness Of The Importance Of Safety Testing Drives the Market Growth

Increased awareness of the importance of safety testing plays a significant role in driving the growth of the global in-vitro toxicology testing market. As stakeholders across industries become more informed about the benefits and necessity of rigorous safety assessments, the demand for in-vitro testing methods rises. Growing awareness of animal welfare and ethical concerns associated with traditional animal testing methods has led to increased demand for alternative approaches, such as in-vitro testing. Stakeholders are increasingly recognizing the need for humane and more socially responsible testing methods. Consumer awareness and concerns about the safety of products they use, including pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and food additives, are driving demand for more thorough safety assessments. In-vitro toxicology testing provides a reliable means to evaluate potential risks and ensure consumer safety. Media coverage and advocacy campaigns focusing on the potential hazards of certain chemicals and substances have heightened public awareness of the importance of safety testing. This increased attention encourages regulatory agencies, industries, and researchers to prioritize safety assessments using advanced methods like in-vitro testing. Regulatory agencies worldwide are emphasizing the importance of comprehensive safety testing for new compounds before they are approved for commercial use. Increased awareness of regulatory guidelines and requirements prompts industries to invest in advanced testing methods like in-vitro toxicology. Greater awareness of environmental impacts and ecological considerations related to chemical exposure fuels the demand for in-vitro testing methods that can assess both human health and environmental safety.


Download Free Sample Report

Key Market Challenges

Complexity of Biological Systems

The complexity of biological systems poses significant challenges to the global in-vitro toxicity testing market. While in-vitro methods offer numerous advantages, accurately replicating the intricate interactions and dynamic processes that occur within living organisms is a complex endeavor. The challenges arising from biological complexity impact the predictive accuracy, relevance, and applicability of in-vitro toxicity testing. In-vitro models often focus on individual cell types or simplified tissues, which fail to capture the interactions between different organs, tissues, and cell types that occur in the whole organism. This limitation reduces the ability to predict systemic effects and complex physiological responses. Cells in the body interact within a specific microenvironment, including extracellular matrix, signaling molecules, and neighboring cells. Replicating these interactions in in-vitro models is challenging, potentially leading to altered cellular behavior and responses.

Limited Relevance for Some Endpoints

The limited relevance of some endpoints in in-vitro toxicity testing poses challenges to the global market. While in-vitro methods offer valuable insights into many aspects of toxicity, there are certain complex and multifaceted toxicological endpoints that may not be well-captured by these models. This limitation affects the ability of in-vitro testing to fully replace traditional animal testing and impacts its application in certain regulatory and research contexts. Some toxicological effects, such as immune responses, hormonal regulation, and organ-specific toxicities, involve intricate interactions between various cell types, tissues, and physiological processes. In-vitro models often cannot fully replicate these complex mechanisms. Chronic toxicity and long-term effects, such as carcinogenicity and reproductive toxicity, are challenging to assess in short-term in-vitro assays. These endpoints require a comprehensive understanding of how substances interact with the body over extended periods, which is difficult to capture in simplified in-vitro systems. Many toxicological responses involve the integration of multiple pathways and processes. In-vitro models may not fully capture the synergistic or cumulative effects that occur in vivo.

Long-Term and Chronic Effects

Assessing long-term and chronic effects poses significant challenges to the global in-vitro toxicity testing market. In-vitro methods are often designed for short-term experiments and may not fully capture the complex and dynamic nature of chronic exposures and their associated effects. This limitation affects the ability of in-vitro testing to predict and assess the long-term impact of substances, especially in contexts such as chronic diseases, carcinogenicity, and reproductive toxicity. In-vitro assays are typically conducted over short time frames, which may not be sufficient to observe and understand time-dependent processes that occur in chronic exposures, such as accumulation of damage or gradual development of adverse effects. Chronic exposures can lead to cumulative effects over time, which are difficult to replicate in short-term in-vitro experiments. These cumulative effects may result from repeated exposures, metabolic processes, or progressive damage to cellular components.

Key Market Trends

Personalized Medicine Applications

Personalized medicine applications represent a significant trend in the global in-vitro toxicity testing market. Personalized medicine aims to tailor medical treatment to the individual characteristics of each patient, including their genetic makeup, lifestyle, and environmental factors. In the context of in-vitro toxicity testing, personalized medicine applications involve assessing how an individual's unique genetic and physiological characteristics influence their response to potential toxicants. In-vitro toxicity testing can be used to evaluate how a patient's specific genetic and molecular profile influences their susceptibility to adverse effects from chemicals and drugs. This approach enables more accurate and personalized risk assessments, helping to identify individuals who may be particularly sensitive to certain substances. By using patient-derived cells or tissues, researchers can conduct in-vitro toxicity testing to predict how an individual's body might respond to a particular compound. This information can guide treatment decisions and drug choices to maximize efficacy and minimize risks for each patient. In-vitro toxicity testing can help identify biomarkers or specific molecular indicators that signal potential toxic responses in certain individuals. These biomarkers can be used to monitor and predict toxicity in real-time during treatment. In-vitro toxicity testing can play a crucial role in identifying compounds that may lead to adverse reactions in specific patient populations. By selecting safer alternatives based on personalized testing, the risk of adverse effects can be significantly reduced.

Segmental Insights

Technology Insights

In 2022, the In-vitro Toxicology Testing market was dominated by the reactive Cell Culture Technology and is predicted to continue expanding over the coming years. Cell culture technology is a highly accurate and reliable method for toxicity testing. This is because cells can be grown in a controlled environment and can be exposed to a variety of toxicants. Cell culture technology can be used to test the toxicity of a wide range of chemicals and drugs. This is because cells can be derived from a variety of tissues and organs. Cell culture technology can be used to assess the acute toxicity of a chemical or drug. This is done by exposing cells to a single dose of the chemical or drug and measuring the effects on cell viability and function. The segment is projected to experience the highest compound annual growth rate (CAGR) from 2023 to 2030.

Application Insights

In 2022, the In-vitro Toxicology Testing market was dominated by systemic toxicology segment and is predicted to continue expanding over the coming years. Regulatory agencies require comprehensive safety assessments of chemicals, pharmaceuticals, and consumer products to ensure human health and environmental safety. Systemic toxicity testing is a crucial aspect of these assessments, as it provides valuable information about the potential adverse effects of substances on different organs and systems. Systemic toxicity testing using in-vitro methods allows for the prediction of the potential toxic effects of substances on various organ systems without the need for animal testing. This predictive capability is essential for early-stage safety evaluations and risk assessments. In drug development, assessing systemic toxicity is vital to ensure the safety of new compounds before they enter clinical trials. In-vitro systemic toxicity testing helps identify potential safety concerns and adverse effects on different organs, contributing to the selection and optimization of drug candidates.

Method Insight

In 2022, the In-vitro Toxicology Testing market was dominated by cellular assay segment and is predicted to continue expanding over the coming years. Cellular assays allow for the direct assessment of toxic effects on human cells, providing valuable insights into how substances interact with biological systems that closely resemble human physiology. This relevance is essential for accurately predicting human responses. Cellular assays can be adapted to high-throughput formats, enabling the rapid screening of a large number of compounds for potential toxicity. This efficiency is crucial for industries with extensive compound libraries, such as pharmaceutical and chemical companies. Cellular assays provide mechanistic insights into how toxicants interact with cellular pathways, enabling researchers to understand the underlying molecular mechanisms of toxicity. This information is vital for risk assessment, hazard identification, and the development of safer products.

End-User Insight

In 2022, the In-vitro Toxicology Testing market was dominated by pharmaceutical industry segment and is predicted to continue expanding over the coming years. The pharmaceutical industry is constantly developing new drugs to treat a variety of diseases. In-vitro toxicity testing is used to assess the safety of these drugs before they are tested in humans. Regulatory agencies in many countries require the use of in-vitro toxicity testing for the safety assessment of new drugs. This is to ensure that these drugs are safe for human use. In-vitro toxicity testing is used to assess the safety of new drugs during the drug discovery process. This is done to identify potential risks early on and to prevent the development of drugs that are unsafe.


Download Free Sample Report

Regional Insights

The North America region has established itself as the leader in the Global In-vitro Toxicology Testing Market. The pharmaceutical industry in North America is one of the most advanced and productive in the world. This is driving the demand for in-vitro toxicity testing to assess the safety of new drugs. Regulatory agencies in North America, such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), require the use of in-vitro toxicity testing for the safety assessment of new drugs. This is to ensure that these drugs are safe for human use. There have been significant advances in in-vitro toxicity technologies in recent years. These advances have made it possible to develop more accurate and reliable tests that can be used to assess the safety of new drugs.

Recent Developments

  • In August 2023, The Charles River laboratories international, Inc. (CRL) announced today the scheduled opening of the Charles River accelerator and development lab, Charles River Accelerator®, in Seattle and Philadelphia. Charles River Accelerator® Seattle is Charles River’s latest investment in Seattle. The company’s first facility opened in 2021 in response to the rapidly expanding city’s position as a leading life sciences center with strong start-up and business growth. CRADL® Seattle is set to open this September and responds to the growing demand for more dynamic vivarium space, as well as in vivo on-demand study support services. As a leading contract vivarium provider, Charles River Laboratories International (CRL) is committed to expanding the capacity of its biopharmaceutical facilities to meet the growing demands of the industry.
  • In August 2021, Sidebar Image Pete Coody Dr. Martin Cole Partnering with ERSS Laboratory in Hercules, North America Center of Testing Excellence Hercules, North America Erosion and Radioactivity (E&O) Testing Erosion Detection and Reactivation (EDR) Environmental Fate & Metabolism Testing.
  • In August 2023, Evotec, a clinical phase biotechnology company, today announced that it is partnering with the world’s leading small molecule RNA modifying enzyme (RME) drug discovery company (STORM) to present the discovery of STORM’s lead clinical candidate (STC-15) at its Fall 2023 conference (ACS). “STC-15” was co-developed and developed by Evotec and STORM, a company focused on the discovery and development of novel small molecule therapeutics (NMTs) focused on oncology (cancer) and other diseases. STC-15 is a highly selective, orally bioavailable, and RME inhibitor for METTL3.

Key Market Players

  • Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.
  • SGS S.A.
  • Merck KGaA
  • Eurofins Scientific
  • Abbott Laboratories
  • Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings
  • Evotec S.E.
  • Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
  • Quest Diagnostics Incorporated
  • Agilent Technologies, Inc. 

 By Technology

By Application

By Region

  • Cell Culture Technology
  • High Throughput Technology
  • Molecular Imaging
  • OMICS Technology
  • Systemic Toxicology
  • Dermal Toxicity
  • Endocrine Disruption
  • Occular Toxicity
  • Others

North America

Europe

Asia Pacific

South America

Middle East & Africa

Report Scope:

In this report, the Global In-vitro Toxicology Testing Market has been segmented into the following categories, in addition to the industry trends which have also been detailed below:

  • In-vitro Toxicology Testing Market, By Technology:

o    Cell Culture Technology

o    High Throughput Technology

o    Molecular Imaging

o    OMICS Technology

  • In-vitro Toxicology Testing Market, By Application:

o    Systemic Toxicology

o    Dermal Toxicity

o    Endocrine Disruption

o    Occular Toxicity

o    Others

  • In-vitro Toxicology Testing Market, By Method:

o    Cellular Assay

o    Biochemical Assay

o    In-silico

o    Ex-vivo

  • In-vitro Toxicology Testing Market, By End User:

o    Pharmaceutical Industry

o    Cosmetics & Household Products

o    Academic Institutes & Research Laboratories

o    Diagnostics

o    Chemicals Industry

o    Food Industry

  • Global In-vitro Toxicology Testing Market, By region:

o   North America

§  United States

§  Canada

§  Mexico

o   Asia-Pacific

§  China

§  India

§  South Korea

§  Australia

§  Japan

o   Europe

§  Germany

§  France

§  United Kingdom

§  Spain

§  Italy

o   South America

§  Brazil

§  Argentina

§  Colombia

o   Middle East & Africa

§  South Africa

§  Saudi Arabia

§  UAE

Competitive Landscape

Company Profiles: Detailed analysis of the major companies present in the Global In-vitro Toxicology Testing Market.

Available Customizations:

Global In-vitro Toxicology Testing Market report with the given market data, TechSci Research offers customizations according to a company's specific needs. The following customization options are available for the report:

Company Information

  • Detailed analysis and profiling of additional market players (up to five).

Global In-vitro Toxicology Testing Market is an upcoming report to be released soon. If you wish an early delivery of this report or want to confirm the date of release, please contact us at [email protected]

Table of content

Table of content

1.    Product Overview

1.1.  Market Definition

1.2.  Scope of the Market

1.2.1.   Markets Covered

1.2.2.   Years Considered for Study

1.2.3.   Key Market Segmentations

2.    Research Methodology

2.1.  Objective of the Study

2.2.  Baseline Methodology

2.3.  Key Industry Partners

2.4.  Major Association and Secondary Sources

2.5.  Forecasting Methodology

2.6.  Data Triangulation & Validation

2.7.  Assumptions and Limitations

3.    Executive Summary

3.1.  Overview of the Market

3.2.  Overview of Key Market Segmentations

3.3.  Overview of Key Market Players

3.4.  Overview of Key Regions/Countries

3.5.  Overview of Market Drivers, Challenges, Trends

4.    Voice of Customer

5.    Global In-vitro Toxicology Testing Market Outlook

5.1.  Market Size & Forecast

5.1.1.   By Value

5.2.  Market Share & Forecast

5.2.1.   By Technology (Cell Culture Technology, High Throughput Technology, Molecular Imaging, OMICS Technology)

5.2.2.   By Application (Systemic Toxicology, Dermal Toxicity, Endocrine Disruption, Occular Toxicity, Others)

5.2.3.   By Method (Cellular Assay, Biochemical Assay, In-Silico, Ex-Vivo)

5.2.4.   By End-User (Pharmaceutical Industry, Cosmetics & Household Products, Academic Institutes & Research Laboratories, Diagnostics, Chemicals Industry, Food Industry)

5.2.5.   By Company (2022)

5.2.6.   By Region

5.3.  Market Map

6.    North America In-vitro Toxicology Testing Market Outlook

6.1.  Market Size & Forecast          

6.1.1.   By Value

6.2.  Market Share & Forecast

6.2.1.   By Technology

6.2.2.   By Application

6.2.3.   By Method

6.2.4.   By End-User

6.2.5.   By Country

6.3.  North America: Country Analysis

6.3.1.   United States In-vitro Toxicology Testing Market Outlook

6.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast

6.3.1.1.1.               By Value

6.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast

6.3.1.2.1.               By Technology

6.3.1.2.2.               By Application

6.3.1.2.3.               By Method

6.3.1.2.4.               By End-User

6.3.2.   Mexico In-vitro Toxicology Testing Market Outlook

6.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast

6.3.2.1.1.               By Value

6.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast

6.3.2.2.1.               By Technology

6.3.2.2.2.               By Application

6.3.2.2.3.               By Method

6.3.2.2.4.               By End-User

6.3.3.   Canada In-vitro Toxicology Testing Market Outlook

6.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast

6.3.3.1.1.               By Value

6.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast

6.3.3.2.1.               By Technology

6.3.3.2.2.               By Application

6.3.3.2.3.               By Method

6.3.3.2.4.               By End-User

7.    Europe In-vitro Toxicology Testing Market Outlook

7.1.  Market Size & Forecast          

7.1.1.   By Value

7.2.  Market Share & Forecast

7.2.1.   By Technology

7.2.2.   By Application

7.2.3.   By Method

7.2.4.   By End-User

7.2.5.   By Country

7.3.  Europe: Country Analysis

7.3.1.   France In-vitro Toxicology Testing Market Outlook

7.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast

7.3.1.1.1.               By Value

7.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast

7.3.1.2.1.               By Technology

7.3.1.2.2.               By Application

7.3.1.2.3.               By Method

7.3.1.2.4.               By End-User

7.3.2.   Germany In-vitro Toxicology Testing Market Outlook

7.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast

7.3.2.1.1.               By Value

7.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast

7.3.2.2.1.               By Technology

7.3.2.2.2.               By Application

7.3.2.2.3.               By Method

7.3.2.2.4.               By End-User

7.3.3.   United Kingdom In-vitro Toxicology Testing Market Outlook

7.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast

7.3.3.1.1.               By Value

7.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast

7.3.3.2.1.               By Technology

7.3.3.2.2.               By Application

7.3.3.2.3.               By Method

7.3.3.2.4.               By End-User

7.3.4.   Italy In-vitro Toxicology Testing Market Outlook

7.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast

7.3.4.1.1.               By Value

7.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast

7.3.4.2.1.               By Technology

7.3.4.2.2.               By Application

7.3.4.2.3.               By Method

7.3.4.2.4.               By End-User

7.3.5.   Spain In-vitro Toxicology Testing Market Outlook

7.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast

7.3.5.1.1.               By Value

7.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast

7.3.5.2.1.               By Technology

7.3.5.2.2.               By Application

7.3.5.2.3.               By Method

7.3.5.2.4.               By End-User

8.    Asia-Pacific In-vitro Toxicology Testing Market Outlook

8.1.  Market Size & Forecast          

8.1.1.   By Value

8.2.  Market Share & Forecast

8.2.1.   By Technology

8.2.2.   By Application

8.2.3.   By Method

8.2.4.   By End-User

8.2.5.   By Country

8.3.  Asia-Pacific: Country Analysis

8.3.1.   China In-vitro Toxicology Testing Market Outlook

8.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast

8.3.1.1.1.               By Value

8.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast

8.3.1.2.1.               By Technology

8.3.1.2.2.               By Application

8.3.1.2.3.               By Method

8.3.1.2.4.               By End-User

8.3.2.   India In-vitro Toxicology Testing Market Outlook

8.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast

8.3.2.1.1.               By Value

8.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast

8.3.2.2.1.               By Technology

8.3.2.2.2.               By Application

8.3.2.2.3.               By Method

8.3.2.2.4.               By End-User

8.3.3.   South Korea In-vitro Toxicology Testing Market Outlook

8.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast

8.3.3.1.1.               By Value

8.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast

8.3.3.2.1.               By Technology

8.3.3.2.2.               By Application

8.3.3.2.3.               By Method

8.3.3.2.4.               By End-User

8.3.4.   Japan In-vitro Toxicology Testing Market Outlook

8.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast

8.3.4.1.1.               By Value

8.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast

8.3.4.2.1.               By Technology

8.3.4.2.2.               By Application

8.3.4.2.3.               By Method

8.3.4.2.4.               By End-User

8.3.5.   Australia In-vitro Toxicology Testing Market Outlook

8.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast

8.3.5.1.1.               By Value

8.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast

8.3.5.2.1.               By Technology

8.3.5.2.2.               By Application

8.3.5.2.3.               By Method

8.3.5.2.4.               By End-User

9.    South America In-vitro Toxicology Testing Market Outlook

9.1.  Market Size & Forecast          

9.1.1.   By Value

9.2.  Market Share & Forecast

9.2.1.   By Technology

9.2.2.   By Application

9.2.3.   By Method

9.2.4.   By End-User

9.2.5.   By Country

9.3.  South America: Country Analysis

9.3.1.   Brazil In-vitro Toxicology Testing Market Outlook

9.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast

9.3.1.1.1.               By Value

9.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast

9.3.1.2.1.               By Technology

9.3.1.2.2.               By Application

9.3.1.2.3.               By Method

9.3.1.2.4.               By End-User

9.3.2.   Argentina In-vitro Toxicology Testing Market Outlook

9.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast

9.3.2.1.1.               By Value

9.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast

9.3.2.2.1.               By Technology

9.3.2.2.2.               By Application

9.3.2.2.3.               By Method

9.3.2.2.4.               By End-User

9.3.3.   Colombia In-vitro Toxicology Testing Market Outlook

9.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast

9.3.3.1.1.               By Value

9.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast

9.3.3.2.1.               By Technology

9.3.3.2.2.               By Application

9.3.3.2.3.               By Method

9.3.3.2.4.               By End-User

10.  Middle East and Africa In-vitro Toxicology Testing Market Outlook

10.1.              Market Size & Forecast

10.1.1.                By Value

10.2.              Market Share & Forecast

10.2.1.                By Technology

10.2.2.                By Application

10.2.3.                By Method

10.2.4.                By End-User

10.2.5.                By Country

10.3.              MEA: Country Analysis

10.3.1.                South Africa In-vitro Toxicology Testing Market Outlook

10.3.1.1.              Market Size & Forecast

10.3.1.1.1.             By Value

10.3.1.2.              Market Share & Forecast

10.3.1.2.1.             By Technology

10.3.1.2.2.             By Application

10.3.1.2.3.             By Method

10.3.1.2.4.             By End-User

10.3.2.                Saudi Arabia In-vitro Toxicology Testing Market Outlook

10.3.2.1.              Market Size & Forecast

10.3.2.1.1.             By Value

10.3.2.2.              Market Share & Forecast

10.3.2.2.1.             By Technology

10.3.2.2.2.             By Application

10.3.2.2.3.             By Method

10.3.2.2.4.             By End-User

10.3.3.                UAE In-vitro Toxicology Testing Market Outlook

10.3.3.1.              Market Size & Forecast

10.3.3.1.1.             By Value

10.3.3.2.              Market Share & Forecast

10.3.3.2.1.             By Technology

10.3.3.2.2.             By Application

10.3.3.2.3.             By Method

10.3.3.2.4.             By End-User

11.  Market Dynamics

11.1.              Drivers

11.2.              Challenges

12.  Market Trends & Developments

12.1.              Recent Developments

12.2.              Product Launches

12.3.              Mergers & Acquisitions

13.  PESTLE Analysis

14.  Porter’s Five Forces Analysis

14.1.              Competition in the Industry

14.2.              Potential of New Entrants

14.3.              Power of Suppliers

14.4.              Power of Customers

14.5.              Threat of Substitute Product

15.  Competitive Landscape

15.1.              Business Overview

15.2.              Company Snapshot

15.3.              Products & Services

15.4.              Financials (In case of listed companies)

15.5.              Recent Developments

15.6.              SWOT Analysis

15.6.1.  Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.

15.6.2.  SGS S.A.

15.6.3.  Merck KGaA

15.6.4.  Eurofins Scientific

15.6.5.  Abbott Laboratories

15.6.6.  Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings

15.6.7.  Evotec S.E.

15.6.8.  Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.

15.6.9.  Quest Diagnostics Incorporated

15.6.10.                Agilent Technolgies, Inc.

15.6.11.                Catalent, Inc.

16.  Strategic Recommendations

Figures and Tables

Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

The market size of the Global In-vitro Toxicology Testing Market was estimated to be USD 16.09 Billion in 2022.

Charles River Laboratories International, Inc., SGS S.A., Merck KGaA, Eurofins Scientific, Abbott Laboratories, Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, Evotec S.E., Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Quest Diagnostics Incorporated, Agilent Technolgies, Inc., Catalent, Inc. are some of the key players operating in the Global In-vitro Toxicology Testing Market.

Long term and chronic effects and Limited Relevance for Some Endpoints are the major challenges faced by the Global In-vitro Toxicology Testing Market in the upcoming years.

Rising Demand For Safety Assessment Of New Drugs And Chemicals and advances in In-Vitro Toxicity technologies is majorly driving the demand for the global In-vitro Toxicology Testing market.

Related Reports